by:Adxonist
by, FromAdxonist
So called democracy
tablets are three-cutting Clue: Dr. Malley (Robert Redford played) and students Todd, Senator Ivring (Tom Cruise played) and the Reporter Janine (Meryl Streep played), and students on the battlefield and the Arian and his comrades in arms Ernest. The three leads a field of three, each of the two at their resistance, and three field between the mutual resistance. The director is the intention of criticizing the United States in the Middle East launched a series of war built on the wrong premise, which triggered the so-called democratic mechanism of reflection.
Dr. Malley in a more awkward situation on. Despite the trauma of the Vietnam War, but he still has not lost confidence in the country, he passed teach students to display their own vision, the vision is the hope that students are able to care about politics, in his view, the more people on political and Concerned about the future of the country, the war may be more than positive force in promoting the country embarked on a bright future. But his surprise that his students Arian and Ernest are in the army to join the war in Afghanistan as the most effective way for the country, while the other extreme are students in Todd is seen through a political show, the trickery of the political contest after a thorough Give up confidence. And Dr. Malley does not want his students involved in the war and became the wrong political decision-making under the victim, but also more reluctant to young people politically apathetic, this is for this country in the wrong way on a more slippery Yuan is to restore the lost hope.
In particular, the film critic who criticized the dialogue lies in too many places. The Boston Globe has called for comments on the "political drama feels more like a lecture". The whole film is more film than a series of lectures and admonished: Members admonished journalists, professors admonished students, the two hope to the professor admonished the students to their classmates, admonished army lieutenant colonel.
Indeed, the film's dialogue is more. Fortunately, these dialogues been brilliant, fast and effective, soliciting of thinking. Perhaps the film art from the construction elements of view, this is a Yingshang, but some of the audience if I do not have such as Oscar judges, who are attracted by the dialogue would not mind this issue. Although the film in the U.S., Europe and other places have been subjected to critics after the release of the shelling, but there are still considerable in it. At least for a general lack of democratic life in the country's people, even if the film smashed the myth of the democratic significance, but the collapse of the process may not be far away and wait and see the communities, is also a sense of the Reconstruction. This is perhaps better able to explain, may be less Falsification of things is deceptive.
The Hollywood Reporter that the director and scriptwriter with a calm and non-emotional manner to the audience showed their support and opposition to the U.S. The invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan point of view, which triggered the audience to think deeply. Redford in the film to resort to those who believe that the U.S. military to wage war is the wrong crowd point of view, but he will be responsible tone to attract a wider audience. It is difficult to comment on many of the positive
original link:http://daimones.blogspot.com/2008/05/blog-post_3261.html
No comments:
Post a Comment