Disappointed not to

by:李笑来

"tax"in the Chinese had in the old tax is a name, for example, car "tax", the "tax", today we will continue to use the word justice - "Kejuanzashui."The people mentioned in today's "contributions", including "tax"is a verb, meaning "free to give."

donor money, "contributions"This action by definition, 1) free of 2) is voluntary.donations, contributions must be clear about which is not a citizen of the "obligation"or "responsibility."

If you choose to contribute, then you should keep in mind you do this free of. That means: If you think 1) because of your contributions than those who do not have the contributions of people more noble, or 2) because you donate more than those who donated less than you are more noble, more or 3) Some people donated less than you you can despise them, and that is not enough Houdao your own - these ideas are all good reason forfurther growth, untenable.

If you choose a contribution, then you should keep in mind that your action is voluntary. That means that you should have no reason not because others have no right to donate more than you or less and psychological imbalance -, for whatever reason, this psychological imbalance are on their previous "voluntary"The betrayal.

because contributions are voluntary, no matter what kind of reason to require (even force as well as a disguised form of forced) any person contributions are not just the poor, even in such extreme today Circumstances.

some time, some people really are "forced"donations. For example, a flat, the contributions of the people, only you do not donate it - even if you from the truth on the donate more than that is not normal (for example, contributions should also act within our capability) - then you may Become a despised, was the object of discussion (in fact, some people will donate more discussion, that is, in any case there will be this and that "discussions"), was based on this kind of pressure, you end the contributions. If this is the case, also have nothing to complain about - Who let you can not afford this kind of pressure » Perhaps it is only "face-saving protection money"- that the world is as simple as the truth, things have to maintain any cost.

because contributions are voluntary and unpaid, even if the donor a fee-splitting, but also good deeds, is 100 million yuan with donors like the good deeds - the contributions of their own decision on the amount of no difference.any person, including donors, donors, and not donors, has the right under any circumstances for donors to donate the amount of any complaints, dissatisfaction, resentment and other negative emotions.

even more clearly the reasons are, or someone, and is often puzzled (or the so-called "question") such a thing: Why the poor donated much, and the rich have donated less »

first level of explanation is that the rich contribution to the community in general in terms of the number only money, the poor more than the original (which is typical of the majority of the people or not, unwilling to accept, or for various reasons do not want to said The simple truth) - because the rich more money, while the tax burden ratio is higher. [1] those who actually use the rich contributions to more formal than the more stringent approach to pay a so-called "money"- is now used for national disaster relief money from the state treasury, and all the money in the state's financial From the tax. Therefore, even if they do not contribute, we can not say that they did not contribute. If their contributions, so the donation was more good fortune - no matter how much the donation if they have no contributions, no one accused them of the right; even if their contributions to fish for fame at the same time [2], we can not deny Even a little bit of their good deeds.

second level of explanation is that the poor may not have donated a look of so many (again is a typical majority of the people or not, unwilling to accept, or for various reasons do not want to said the simple truth) - because He poorer, so even if he donated all his, in absolute terms, will not be more to what extent - and this is only the statement of fact, there are no disrespect.

third level of explanation is that all donors should not use the amount of money donated and the donor's wealth as a proportion of GDP based on judgement. With a billion people out of the assets of 0.1%of his assets, that is 1 million yuan as donors, only 10,000 yuan than one person come up with assets of 100 per cent of the assets, that is 10,000 yuan as more than 100 donors Times. Who actually donated more »

Some people complain that those who could not help but to the rich "too few contributions,"the fundamental reason is that these people do not believe that wealth can be obtained through normal means, they believe in "no-no to traitors, no to rape not"-- Some people even think that this is precisely the time "Jiefujipin"the best opportunity. Such a person forget another thing: every day they are looking forward wealth - but they did think that means that they have already doomed as long as the future will never have the opportunity to Linxi unscrupulous access to wealth. This is how horrible, tragic, pathetic fate? » -- Unfortunately, they are not aware of it.

there is one thing that people in donations, almost from the physical is not even psychologically unable to shake off the "relevance"on the interference. Have relatives and friends in the earthquake will be around the people who could not help but other than some people donate more, and many times or more. That the United States Sept. 11 attacks killed so many people when, as the Americans and not much of the relationship between us how many people had even an instant impulse contributions »

there is a more difficult to accept the fact that it, and that is: no matter how much money you donate, are of no avail, and in theory you alone a person's contributions certainly little, even if all contributions combined, and certainly not on Be sufficient. However, in turn, hinder any more contributions to the words and deeds (even if some people Duqi donate a penny less) are big sin. Therefore,contributions to make donations, donations have not accused you; and no matter what, are not to make any contributions to the people of speech.donated after the end of life seriously, do not think it should be irrelevant because the things which trouble.not to make any excessive behavior, do not hurt others, but also to protect themselves.

1. some of the rich tax evasion, on the one hand they might be rich "for the rich inhumane,"the other hand have to admit that there are institutional their own problems.
2. For example, asGuangzhou Toyota And MSN Chinaas

original link:http://www.xiaolai.net/?p=959