by:和菜头
[Editor's note: Chang-ping reproduced without self-defence. Since the London torch relay, a domestic liberal intellectuals into a very difficult situation. On the one hand, they have to oppose the domestic issues to resort to violence against the tendency of the Western media reports, maintaining an objective and true; the other hand, they have to be very careful rising nationalistic tendency, and this tendency is simple and patriotic in the struggle together, it is difficult to accurately cut. Therefore, they have to suffer from internal criticism: the defection. Young Patriots have been accused: traitor. So thankless things, but they do, Chang-ping is one of them.
For online aggressive but empty of the accused, without long-defence. Any time, when everyone into the fanaticism of the time, the need for a calm voice. Such efforts, and therefore subject to the humiliation, a day when people can understand these efforts. In this sense, we do not lack Wenfeng, such a person, it is always so long Mr. Ping too few voices. If the Internet is the voice of this issue needs of self-defence, then there is anything you can say?
I thought, if you want a complete ban of Mr. Ping's statement, the only way is to hang him. Then this process can continue, those patriotic er die off, leaving those patriotic est. And then hanged est er - in the selection until the last person left. But before he hanged, we should listen to what he said the point:
"I am not your enemy,"
Source:the long-blog
Author: Chang-ping
April 11 the "Beijing Evening"published a Yiwen "rumors to longer-South", the article is the theme of opposition rumor-mongering, even in the text everywhere slander, it is the history of the most humorous, people Author wrong suspected as the day of the April 1.
Course, many of my friends do not think so, they saw a returning to the style of writing, this is tension, fear and anger. This style of writing Let me also very surprised, but I am more willing to in the text of the facts and the truth for some explanation.
The beginning of this article says: "netizens have recently been critical condemnation of the masses is a long-South are people who may have their own defence of the freedom of speech that users had to speak for him power. "Originally, then it is a guess, but the author Wenfeng, I profess to be a little understanding and investigation, I would like to ask what time I expressed this"might "? The fact is: I am on April 9 in the blog said: "Thanks to the support of all friends, and thanked all objections friends. Bless each and every one, I commend the people, as well as abusive to my people."
I have never disputed that it is good, but recently I was on the network spread slanderous rumors, wanton abuse, beyond the scope of controversy, it shocked people, I wonder what today, Is countries are not "welcome the Olympic Games, stresses Civilization, establish a new trend? "There are many explanations for my friends said they are "pigs", "brain maimed,"I do not agree with. I understand these friends, they hope to reduce this to me harm. Passed back to defense is a human instinct, but as a thinker, I think this is a lazy approach. In the past few days I have spent some time reading those who criticize my message through foul hope to understand its author, I would like to thank This is the reason I believe that the first obscenity dirty himself and injured himself and This is the reason I want to bless.
I think that so many Internet users criticize me, because some people disinformation and incitement, such as the Wenfeng, my freedom of speech advocates distortion. He cited a section of I conclude my words to the "core speech": "freedom of expression, including natural Shuicuhua freedoms, in particular questioned the power of freedom, even more frightening than the rumors of the deprivation of freedom of expression."Three judge, in front of two children I would like to have to understand also, in practice. Is easily misunderstood behind a judgement as to why the denial of freedom of expression is more terrible than the rumors? In fact, reason is very simple, because there is no freedom of expression, not easy to debunk rumors. For example, the events in Tibet, if not allow users to speak, we can know that the Western media distorted reports? Such a simple reason, Mr. Wenfeng do not understand or do not know how loaded, made such an interpretation: "According to this logic: 'freedom of speech' can be confounding black and white, fabricating facts, we can deliberately distort history, can be irresponsible remarks can be 'free 'and rumors,' freedom 'to discredit,' freedom 'and labels. "Wenfeng, it is not my logic, this is your own logic. I mean you Ziganer inference a lot, and then you this inference as to refute my conclusions, the world What kind of reason?
Unfortunately, the Wenfeng, the entire article is a "reasonable". For instance, he said: "In some of the so-called universal values of the southbound requested longer-saw, as long as it is what the West is universal, is the need to adhere to."Then this refuting. When I said I would like to ask such stupid "whatevers"theory? The fact is: countless times in the article, I pointed out in the West, said some Westerners of prejudice against China, has repeatedly criticized the intense Western bias Chomsky, Said and other scholars expressed appreciation. For example, the Wenfeng, said, "newspaper in the South"
original link:http://www.hecaitou.net/?p=2785
No comments:
Post a Comment